English is a tricky language. It’s so tricky, in fact, that even native speakers often make mistakes with it. Here are 14 very commonly misused expressions that many speakers don’t even realize they are using incorrectly. These include irregardless, ex-patriot, piece of mind, could care less, and more.
1o/1o :D
Thanks a lot,Mr.Adam
I wish you New Year’s wishes come true
Jannyl
Thank you, Janyl. To you as well :)
Adam
Thanks a lot Mr. Adam,
Have a nice day
SonyLouis
Thank you Adam and my best wishes for the new year!
Lalananana
To you as well, Lalananana :) Thank you.
Adam
I am trying to be a good student
Stirlyng
Hi Adam! Ii was hard for understanding, but I really like that type of lessons. My quiz score was 80%. I’m going to repeat this lesson, I think those idioms will help to encrease my English. Thanks a lot, bye!
Rosewell
“Encrease my English” -> Probably better to say improve my English.
rokaly
I am better at saying them, rather than using them correctly. Thanks for the much needed lesson.
Darlene Boyd
Thank you Adam and my best wishes for the new year!
beernaard
Thank you, Beernaard. To you as well :)
Adam
Hello Adam
Happy New Year!
First of all, thank you so much for all your great lessons.
I have two questions:
1. In your recent lesson,“ 20 expressions about secrets”, you named “Snitch” and “ Whistle- blower” as expression. Sometimes Emma also names a single word, which is a noun, adjective or adverb, as an expression, but for those two words dictionaries name them nouns.
Some other examples that you mentioned as expression but dictionaries call them as conjunction, preposition, pronoun, adjective,etc. are: otherwise, each other, one another,regardless, self-deprecating,
hunger pangs and expatriate.
As you know, an expression or idiom is a group of words, not a single word. So, is it possible to name a single word, which is a noun or an adjective, as an expression or idiom?
It’s more logical to name “whistle-blower” as an expression because its meaning is different from the two words individually but the word “Snitch” has just two meanings ( 1. to tell secretly 2. to steal). It’s a new word like “ Marvelous” that we should know its meaning and it doesn’t have figurative meaning like “whistle-blower”.
Am I right?
2. Dictionaries almost always use idiom instead of expression for naming a phrase. For example, they name “Let in on” as idiom and phrasal verb. You named it as an expression. Also, you first said, “ the next expression is “spill the beans” but then you said this idiom means… .”. There is a little difference between idiom and expression. So, how should we correctly name these phrases and put them in the right category? Is it necessary to be accurate in naming them as an expression or idiom?
Arvin.S
Hi Arvin,
An expression is just a particular word or phrase people commonly use for a particular situation.
I don’t think we normally distinguish between idiom and expression too seriously. The main thing to consider is that we only use them in certain situations.
Also, technically, every word or phrase is an expression as it expresses an idea. Snitch has one meaning in terms of secret, but the dictionary meaning doesn’t add the idea that it is a negative, even insulting word to use to refer to someone. If you call someone “a snitch” you are insulting him/her by suggesting he/she is a coward, has no integrity, etc.
An idiom is mainly used to suggest the words in combination have a meaning other than the words themselves individually.
I hope this helps a bit.
Adam
Hi Adam. Have a joyful new year!
I’ve sent my questions to your different emails several times, but I’ve not received any responses yet. If I’ve any questions, how can I communicate with you in order to ask them?
Thank You Kindly!
Johnforest
Hi John,
I usually answer questions here. Feel free to post your questions and I’ll do my best to provide an answer.
Adam
Hello Adam,
I appreciate you taking the time to make another useful lesson.
I want to ask you some questions about functions of prepositional phrases. I would appreciate it if you could help me.
Prepositional phrases have different functions. They can act as an adjective modifying a noun, as an adverb modifying a verb, or as an introduction. Also, we can introduce them as a complement to the sentence.
The questions are:
A. In the following sentences, the prepositional phrases don’t have any of the three functions (adverb, adjective, introduction). So, do they act as a complement? We can’t say they act as object of the verb in two first examples, can we?
“Tom talked to Sam?” ( I think the p.p is giving us more information about the verb by showing who the speech directed at)(Sam is object of to, not talk)
“Do these keys belong to you?” ( you is object of to, not belong)
“It’s a present from her.” (I think the p.p is giving us more information about the present by stating who has sent it)
B. Can a prepositional phrase function as a “direct” or “indirect” object? In which situations?
In the example, “Nalini gave her brother a laptop.” the direct object is “a laptop” and the indirect object is “her brother”. The alternative of this sentence is “Nalini gave a laptop to her brother.” Can we say the prepositional phrase “to her brother” or only “her brother” act as “indirect object”?
C. Objects answer the questions (Who(m), What) about the verb. In prepositional phrase that we have object after the preposition, sometimes like the example, “He slept until noon.”, which the object of the preposition is “noon”, we cannot say, “He slept until what?” and it’s better to say, “He slept until when?”. There are other examples like, “I live near the stadium.” that it’s more logical to ask “Where” than “What or Who(m)”. What is the reason?
D. If the prepositional phrase acts as adverb or adjective, we say they modify verb and noun. If they don’t have these functions, should we say that they are complement? Is it wrong to say they are completing the meaning of verb and noun? Is there any difference between complement and modification in this case?
Thank you for your consideration.
Sarah-kaviy
Hi Sarah-Kaviy,
Tom talked to Sam?” Tom talked is a complete clause, so to Sam is a complement to talked.
“Do these keys belong to you?” Merriam-Webster lists belong to as a phrasal verb. In other words it’s a collocation. You can’t use belong, in terms of possession, without the to and an object.
“It’s a present from her.” adjective complement to present (it’s a present is a complete clause)
B. Can a prepositional phrase function as a “direct” or “indirect” object? In which situations?
I want to see you — direct object (I want what?)
I gave the book to Jill. indirect
In the example, “Nalini gave her brother a laptop.” the direct object is “a laptop” and the indirect object is “her brother”. The alternative of this sentence is “Nalini gave a laptop to her brother.” Can we say the prepositional phrase “to her brother” or only “her brother” act as “indirect object”?– both can be (the verb gave already has the direction implied in it)
C. Objects answer the questions (Who(m), What) about the verb. In prepositional phrase that we have object after the preposition, sometimes like the example, “He slept until noon.”, which the object of the preposition is “noon”, we cannot say, “He slept until what?” and it’s better to say, “He slept until when?”. There are other examples like, “I live near the stadium.” that it’s more logical to ask “Where” than “What or Who(m)”. What is the reason? — noon and stadium are not objects. They’re adverb complements: until noon is an adverb phrase, near the stadium is an adverb phrase.
D. If the prepositional phrase acts as adverb or adjective, we say they modify verb and noun. If they don’t have these functions, should we say that they are complement? Is it wrong to say they are completing the meaning of verb and noun? Is there any difference between complement and modification in this case?
Thank you for your consideration– modify means change. complement means complete.
He slept well modify (how he slept)
He slept until noon – clarify (complete meaning) (when he slept)
Hope this helps
Adam
hello adam .i want to learning the english from zero could you please to give me advice
The main thing is to practice as often as you can.
But, at the beginning, build your vocabulary. Without words, grammar and other things won’t help.
Good luck.
Adam
Happy new year!
ChrisKings
To you as well Chris :). Thanks.
Adam
Excellent video, I’ve learned a lot, thanks.
Conal6619
Hi Adam, I would like to thank you for your always interesting lessons and for your amazing pronunciation that makes English easy and completely understandable. As a native Italian speaker, lessons concerning idiomatic phrases or academic and sophisticated words often come easy to me because of the frequent Latin roots of the vocabulary. Phrasal verbs, on the other hand, drive me crazy,random exceptions turned into rules.
sbisiga
another banger video
EthanBS
Hello Adam sir,”The horse is too fast to run” is correct sentence ?, if it is correct how can we change it in form of so…..that
pratima tomar
Hi Pratima,
I’m afraid this sentence doesn’t make sense.
The horse is too slow to race. That makes logical sense. Too fast means he should be able to run.
Adam
Hello Adam sir ,” The horse is too fast to win the race ” is correct sentence? If it is correct how can we change into so….that ?
pratima tomar
This also doesn’t make sense logically. The fastest horse usually wins.
The horse is not fast enough to win the race makes sense.
Adam
Hahhahaha I like the word hunger pangs
Seif Eldawla
Thanks a lot Mr. Adam!!
yuhan1224
Thanks everyone :)
Happy New Year.
Adam
Hello, Adam! Do you see US English and Canadian Englsih as one when it comes to expressions, slangs, etc.? Thanks!
A.Siderov
I think “deep-seeded” somehow makes more sense for a non-native :)
Hung Le
Thanks a lot Mr.Adam.
Alex-1956
thanks a lot, Mr.Adam and I have two questions I don’t understand the expression: nip in the bud. and the other one: expatriate
Learn English for free with 2132 video lessons by experienced teachers. Classes cover English grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, IELTS, TOEFL, and more. Join millions of English learners worldwide who are improving every day with engVid.
36 COMMENTS
1o/1o :D
Thanks a lot,Mr.Adam
I wish you New Year’s wishes come true
Thank you, Janyl. To you as well :)
Thanks a lot Mr. Adam,
Have a nice day
Thank you Adam and my best wishes for the new year!
To you as well, Lalananana :) Thank you.
I am trying to be a good student
Hi Adam! Ii was hard for understanding, but I really like that type of lessons. My quiz score was 80%. I’m going to repeat this lesson, I think those idioms will help to encrease my English. Thanks a lot, bye!
“Encrease my English” -> Probably better to say improve my English.
I am better at saying them, rather than using them correctly. Thanks for the much needed lesson.
Thank you Adam and my best wishes for the new year!
Thank you, Beernaard. To you as well :)
Hello Adam
Happy New Year!
First of all, thank you so much for all your great lessons.
I have two questions:
1. In your recent lesson,“ 20 expressions about secrets”, you named “Snitch” and “ Whistle- blower” as expression. Sometimes Emma also names a single word, which is a noun, adjective or adverb, as an expression, but for those two words dictionaries name them nouns.
Some other examples that you mentioned as expression but dictionaries call them as conjunction, preposition, pronoun, adjective,etc. are: otherwise, each other, one another,regardless, self-deprecating,
hunger pangs and expatriate.
As you know, an expression or idiom is a group of words, not a single word. So, is it possible to name a single word, which is a noun or an adjective, as an expression or idiom?
It’s more logical to name “whistle-blower” as an expression because its meaning is different from the two words individually but the word “Snitch” has just two meanings ( 1. to tell secretly 2. to steal). It’s a new word like “ Marvelous” that we should know its meaning and it doesn’t have figurative meaning like “whistle-blower”.
Am I right?
2. Dictionaries almost always use idiom instead of expression for naming a phrase. For example, they name “Let in on” as idiom and phrasal verb. You named it as an expression. Also, you first said, “ the next expression is “spill the beans” but then you said this idiom means… .”. There is a little difference between idiom and expression. So, how should we correctly name these phrases and put them in the right category? Is it necessary to be accurate in naming them as an expression or idiom?
Hi Arvin,
An expression is just a particular word or phrase people commonly use for a particular situation.
I don’t think we normally distinguish between idiom and expression too seriously. The main thing to consider is that we only use them in certain situations.
Also, technically, every word or phrase is an expression as it expresses an idea. Snitch has one meaning in terms of secret, but the dictionary meaning doesn’t add the idea that it is a negative, even insulting word to use to refer to someone. If you call someone “a snitch” you are insulting him/her by suggesting he/she is a coward, has no integrity, etc.
An idiom is mainly used to suggest the words in combination have a meaning other than the words themselves individually.
I hope this helps a bit.
Hi Adam. Have a joyful new year!
I’ve sent my questions to your different emails several times, but I’ve not received any responses yet. If I’ve any questions, how can I communicate with you in order to ask them?
Thank You Kindly!
Hi John,
I usually answer questions here. Feel free to post your questions and I’ll do my best to provide an answer.
Hello Adam,
I appreciate you taking the time to make another useful lesson.
I want to ask you some questions about functions of prepositional phrases. I would appreciate it if you could help me.
Prepositional phrases have different functions. They can act as an adjective modifying a noun, as an adverb modifying a verb, or as an introduction. Also, we can introduce them as a complement to the sentence.
The questions are:
A. In the following sentences, the prepositional phrases don’t have any of the three functions (adverb, adjective, introduction). So, do they act as a complement? We can’t say they act as object of the verb in two first examples, can we?
“Tom talked to Sam?” ( I think the p.p is giving us more information about the verb by showing who the speech directed at)(Sam is object of to, not talk)
“Do these keys belong to you?” ( you is object of to, not belong)
“It’s a present from her.” (I think the p.p is giving us more information about the present by stating who has sent it)
B. Can a prepositional phrase function as a “direct” or “indirect” object? In which situations?
In the example, “Nalini gave her brother a laptop.” the direct object is “a laptop” and the indirect object is “her brother”. The alternative of this sentence is “Nalini gave a laptop to her brother.” Can we say the prepositional phrase “to her brother” or only “her brother” act as “indirect object”?
C. Objects answer the questions (Who(m), What) about the verb. In prepositional phrase that we have object after the preposition, sometimes like the example, “He slept until noon.”, which the object of the preposition is “noon”, we cannot say, “He slept until what?” and it’s better to say, “He slept until when?”. There are other examples like, “I live near the stadium.” that it’s more logical to ask “Where” than “What or Who(m)”. What is the reason?
D. If the prepositional phrase acts as adverb or adjective, we say they modify verb and noun. If they don’t have these functions, should we say that they are complement? Is it wrong to say they are completing the meaning of verb and noun? Is there any difference between complement and modification in this case?
Thank you for your consideration.
Hi Sarah-Kaviy,
Tom talked to Sam?” Tom talked is a complete clause, so to Sam is a complement to talked.
“Do these keys belong to you?” Merriam-Webster lists belong to as a phrasal verb. In other words it’s a collocation. You can’t use belong, in terms of possession, without the to and an object.
“It’s a present from her.” adjective complement to present (it’s a present is a complete clause)
B. Can a prepositional phrase function as a “direct” or “indirect” object? In which situations?
I want to see you — direct object (I want what?)
I gave the book to Jill. indirect
In the example, “Nalini gave her brother a laptop.” the direct object is “a laptop” and the indirect object is “her brother”. The alternative of this sentence is “Nalini gave a laptop to her brother.” Can we say the prepositional phrase “to her brother” or only “her brother” act as “indirect object”?– both can be (the verb gave already has the direction implied in it)
C. Objects answer the questions (Who(m), What) about the verb. In prepositional phrase that we have object after the preposition, sometimes like the example, “He slept until noon.”, which the object of the preposition is “noon”, we cannot say, “He slept until what?” and it’s better to say, “He slept until when?”. There are other examples like, “I live near the stadium.” that it’s more logical to ask “Where” than “What or Who(m)”. What is the reason? — noon and stadium are not objects. They’re adverb complements: until noon is an adverb phrase, near the stadium is an adverb phrase.
D. If the prepositional phrase acts as adverb or adjective, we say they modify verb and noun. If they don’t have these functions, should we say that they are complement? Is it wrong to say they are completing the meaning of verb and noun? Is there any difference between complement and modification in this case?
Thank you for your consideration– modify means change. complement means complete.
He slept well modify (how he slept)
He slept until noon – clarify (complete meaning) (when he slept)
Hope this helps
hello adam .i want to learning the english from zero could you please to give me advice
Check the following for some advices:
https://www.engvid.com/how-not-to-learn-a-language/
Hi Sla,
The main thing is to practice as often as you can.
But, at the beginning, build your vocabulary. Without words, grammar and other things won’t help.
Good luck.
Happy new year!
To you as well Chris :). Thanks.
Excellent video, I’ve learned a lot, thanks.
Hi Adam, I would like to thank you for your always interesting lessons and for your amazing pronunciation that makes English easy and completely understandable. As a native Italian speaker, lessons concerning idiomatic phrases or academic and sophisticated words often come easy to me because of the frequent Latin roots of the vocabulary. Phrasal verbs, on the other hand, drive me crazy,random exceptions turned into rules.
another banger video
Hello Adam sir,”The horse is too fast to run” is correct sentence ?, if it is correct how can we change it in form of so…..that
Hi Pratima,
I’m afraid this sentence doesn’t make sense.
The horse is too slow to race. That makes logical sense. Too fast means he should be able to run.
Hello Adam sir ,” The horse is too fast to win the race ” is correct sentence? If it is correct how can we change into so….that ?
This also doesn’t make sense logically. The fastest horse usually wins.
The horse is not fast enough to win the race makes sense.
Hahhahaha I like the word hunger pangs
Thanks a lot Mr. Adam!!
Thanks everyone :)
Happy New Year.
Hello, Adam! Do you see US English and Canadian Englsih as one when it comes to expressions, slangs, etc.? Thanks!
I think “deep-seeded” somehow makes more sense for a non-native :)
Thanks a lot Mr.Adam.
thanks a lot, Mr.Adam and I have two questions I don’t understand the expression: nip in the bud. and the other one: expatriate